It's time to read and vote for your favorite article in the 2013 Write-Off Contest! The four finalist's articles are featured in the May 13 newsletter and can be found through this link. Hurry! Voting ends May 18.
Welcome!
You've found the famous Dave's Garden website! Join this friendly global community that shares tips and ideas for home and gardens, along with seeds and plants!
Check out the DG homepage for a brief overview of what you'll find in this gardening mega-site.
Login
If you don't have an account yet, visit the registration page to sign up.
I have a small/medium sized Ulmus parvifolia that has been doing quite well since we bought it several years ago. But, I just recently noticed (I admit I don't thoroughly examine my trees regularly - I don't know how old these holes are) some holes in the trunk. They are in 3 'groups' of 2, 3 and six holes, all about 4 1/2 ' above the ground and seem to mostly be in a horizontal arrangement. i can see NO other holes lower or higher up or on any branches.
I have read a little about Borers. I pulled a few pieces of the bark away looking for bugs hiding under the flaky bark. No luck. Just now however, I used a piece of stiff wire to probe the holes/kill grubs and discovered the holes are ALL only about 1/16-1/8" deep.
Does this help narrow-down what kind of creature created these holes?
I may try to treat with Bayer or Bonide 'merit' based systemic starting next march but, if I could somehow confirm this is minor damage and/or perhaps unrelated to any harmful bug infestation, I might ignore it.
more googling based on the above suggestion has helped me feel confident what I have are woodpecker/sapsucker holes.
they are not D shaped, they are not in a random 'shotgun' pattern.
should I be concerned about treating/filling/covering these holes? There's no evidence they have ever weeped sap - but I suppose they could in the spring?
You are welcome. I think the tree should be fine as is. The holes are shallow and it sounds like they barely broke through the cambium. Sounds like they were after bugs rather than sap or a hollow hole for nesting. We have a mated pair here that regularly check out the live oak and pines and the trees haven't exhibited any stress from it.
We hear and have often spotted woodpeckers in our area so, most of the data lines up best with that being the source of the holes. And it's exactly as you said, they seem too shallow to have been insect damage. These holes would offer zero protection from the elements for a grub. Perhaps a hungry woodpecker was just 'testing' the tree?
thanx again - I'm just going to monitor the tree I guess. It has done a good job of healing itself in a few places where I have trimmed/shaped it and these wounds are much smaller.
