| Author | Content |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
 September 7, 2007
9:48 AM Post #3947058
| As many of you know, PlantFiles uses a checklist for all new entries to check for genus and family names that have been reviewed and validated.
This new thread is for any PF user to request an additional genus or family name not already on our checklist. (The last thread was getting a bit long ;o)
If you include a family name, please note whether it needs to be added to the checklist, or if you're simply including it for reference. |
ginger749
September 7, 2007
12:32 PM Post #3947638
| Thanks Terry . |
palmbob
Tarzana, CA
(Zone 9b)
 September 19, 2007
12:48 AM Post #3991990
| Need to add Pterodiscus. thanks |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
September 19, 2007
9:24 AM Post #3992649
| Pterodiscus has been added! |
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
September 25, 2007
5:48 PM Post #4016636
| Terry,
could you please add the following genera:
in Epacridaceae:
Lissanthe
Pentachondra
Prionotes
Richea
Sphenotoma
Sprengelia
and in Proteaceae
Orites
thanks,
Ken |
Joan
Belfield, ND
(Zone 4a)
September 25, 2007
8:57 PM Post #4017297
| Hi Ken,
I've added them to the accepted list for you.
Joan |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
September 26, 2007
9:06 AM Post #4018663
| Thanks Joan!!!! |
Resin
Northumberland
(United Kingdom)
(Zone 9a)
September 26, 2007
12:43 PM Post #4019379
|
Note that Epacridaceae (and also Empetraceae, Pyrolaceae, Monotropaceae) have been merged into Ericaceae now:
Kron, K. A. 1996. Phylogenetic Relationships of Empetraceae, Epacridaceae, Ericaceae, Monotropaceae, and Pyrolaceae: Evidence from Nuclear Ribosomal 18s Sequence Data. Annals of Botany 77: 293-303.
[HYPERLINK@aob.oxfordjournals.org]
Kron, K. A., and M. W. Chase. 1993. Systematics of the Ericaceae, Empetraceae, Epacridaceae and related taxa based upon rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanic Garden 80: 735-741.
|
Joan
Belfield, ND
(Zone 4a)
September 26, 2007
4:46 PM Post #4020201
| Hi Resin,
I did notice that some of our sources were using Ericaceae, but some of them were still using Epicaridaceae. I made a note of it and we'll research it further once we get caught up with some of the other family changes we are working on.
Thanks for bringing that to our attention.
Joan |
CHudnall
Sebring, FL
(Zone 9a)
September 30, 2007
2:36 AM Post #4032750
| Please add the following Genus and Species:
Family - Rhamnaceae – Buckthorn family ** Reference - Rhamnaceae is already listed **
Genus - Reynosia Griseb. – darlingplum
Species - Reynosia septentrionalis Urban – darlingplum
Native to Florida - Status: Threatened
-- A shrub to small tree with a full rounded growth habit --
Thanks! :-) |
ginger749
October 1, 2007
9:27 PM Post #4038870
| Hello Terry ,
I have searched high and low for all the details on this Tree .
I can only get 3 out of the 4 requirements .
The Tree is called a Eucalyptus Codonocarpa ,
Commonly called a Bell-Fruited Mallee .
| Quoted: | | On the high ridges to the west and south-west of Mt Norman are the park's only stands of bell-fruited mallee, Eucalyptus codonocarpa. Eucalypts more commonly observed along the walking tracks are New England Blackbutt, Eucalyptus andrewsii subsp. andrewsii, round-leaved gum, orange gum, yellow box, apple box, Youman's stringybark and broad-leaved stingybark. |
Quoted from this link : [HYPERLINK@www.epa.qld.gov.au]
Kell
|
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 1, 2007
10:13 PM Post #4039084
| CHudnall, I've added Reynosia to the checklist.
Kell, you should be able to add any Eucalyptus species to PlantFiles without running it past us here - the genus is already in the checklist. If you run into any snags creating an entry, be sure to double-check the spelling of the genus and family names, as those are the fields that trigger a system check. |
ginger749
October 1, 2007
10:32 PM Post #4039128
| Terry I tried and got this message .
Click the image for an enlarged view.
|
ecrane3
Dublin, CA
(Zone 9a)
October 1, 2007
10:39 PM Post #4039151
| It looks like you might have a space in front of the E in Eucalyptus, it's hard to tell for sure though. |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 1, 2007
10:51 PM Post #4039178
| I think ecrane is correct. Try typing it in and make sure there aren't any extra spaces. |
ginger749
October 1, 2007
11:55 PM Post #4039388
| Yes thank you it worked .
And Pics are loaded . |
CHudnall
Sebring, FL
(Zone 9a)
October 2, 2007
2:48 AM Post #4039619
| Thanks Terry :-) -- Christine |
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
October 2, 2007
3:26 AM Post #4039634
| Kell, I have looked up Eucalyptus codonocarpa in the Flora of Australia and the Flora of New South Wales. The Flora of Australia has it as Eucalyptus approximans subsp. codonocarpa, with Eucalyptus codonocarpa as a synonym. The Flora of New South Wales has them the other way round.
I have added what details I can based on the two floras. One small correction that I cannot make, the species name is always in lower case, that is Eucalyptus codonocarpa NOT Eucalyptus Codonocarpa. If you created the entry, you should be able to amend it. If you open this page: [HYPERLINK@davesgarden.com]
you and only you, should find near the bottom of the page a link
| Quoted: | | » Edit this entry |
follow this link and you can change the case of the species name,
Ken |
ginger749
October 2, 2007
3:49 AM Post #4039639
| Thanks Mate .
I'll give it a try .
^
^
^
No Worries .
As usual , You Saved MY day .
I have 10 Pictures waiting in a Queue .
It was very exciting for me to finally photograph these trees .
I have been going to this exact spot for 46 years
and never knew anything about them .
It was not till I hooked up with you and DG my eyes were opened .
Kell
|
ginger749
October 7, 2007
2:46 AM Post #4056903
| Hi Terry ,
I have done the research on this .
Acacia venulose .
[HYPERLINK@www.catalogueoflife.org]
What did I do wrong ? Kell
Click the image for an enlarged view.
|
ginger749
October 7, 2007
3:03 AM Post #4056908
| Tried this From another link:
[HYPERLINK@zipcodezoo.com]
Click the image for an enlarged view.
|
Joan
Belfield, ND
(Zone 4a)
October 7, 2007
8:59 AM Post #4057157
| Hi ginger749,
We no longer use the Fabaceae family in PlantFiles. [HYPERLINK@davesgarden.com] We use the subfamilies instead. Therefore Acacia would fall under the Mimosaceae family.
About the Acacia genus, I can find reference to Acacia venulosa, but not Acacia wattle. You might want to double check which species you are trying to add.
Joan |
Resin
Northumberland
(United Kingdom)
(Zone 9a)
October 7, 2007
1:16 PM Post #4057782
|
| Quoted: | | We no longer use the Fabaceae family in PlantFiles. [HYPERLINK@davesgarden.com] We use the subfamilies instead. Therefore Acacia would fall under the Mimosaceae family |
Nomenclatural point . . . if treating it as a subfamily rather than a family, the correct name ending is -oideae, i.e., Faboideae, Mimosoideae, Caesalpinioideae.
Resin
|
ginger749
October 7, 2007
2:19 PM Post #4057942
| Thanks Joan ,
I'll give that a shot .
I'm a simple Photographer trying to share My Pics with every one here on DG .
All these New to yall Plants just grow wild all around me .
If I can take some interesting Pic's of them and share , My joy is complete .
All this gobbledygook name calling is a little beyond little ole me .
Maybe all this wisdom comes with age ?
Maybe I’m just to young to understand ? :o)
|
ginger749
October 7, 2007
2:29 PM Post #4057964
| Well Joan that didn't work either . groooowl
Time to take some more Pics . TTFN
Click the image for an enlarged view.
|
claypa
West Pottsgrove, PA
(Zone 6b)
October 7, 2007
2:43 PM Post #4057999
| Use Mimosaceae as the family and it should work... I think when JoanJ referred to using subfamilies as families, the family suffix -aceae is used. |
ginger749
October 7, 2007
3:00 PM Post #4058057
| Thanks Claypa ,
It worked this time .
Let's see how long it stays ? |
ginger749
October 11, 2007
4:37 PM Post #4072671
| Terry,
could you please add the following genera:
Eupomatia
See here .
[HYPERLINK@plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au]
Thanks Kell |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 11, 2007
5:45 PM Post #4072861
| Eupomatia has been added to the checklist - you should be able to create an entry without any further problems! |
ginger749
October 11, 2007
5:48 PM Post #4072868
| Thank you sir .
Cheers Kell. |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 11, 2007
5:51 PM Post #4072879
| ummmm...ma'am will do ;o)
And you're very welcome! |
ginger749
October 11, 2007
6:01 PM Post #4072902
| Oops Sorry ,
Why does Ken refer to you as a ~boy~ ?
The Family is also not there ?
Eupomatiaceae:
I only get these two options .
Eucommiaceae or Euphorbiaceae |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 11, 2007
6:11 PM Post #4072928
| I've added Eupomatiaceae as a valid family as well.
As to the other...guess you'll have to ask Ken ;o) |
ginger749
October 11, 2007
6:13 PM Post #4072936
| Cool , Thanks .
Kell |
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
October 11, 2007
6:31 PM Post #4072993
| When did I refer to Terry as a ~boy~ ? |
ginger749
October 11, 2007
6:43 PM Post #4073054
| In the previous Forum to this .
I'll find it and come back .
Might take a while to find it .
Kell
By the way Ken , I found my mystery Plant .
[HYPERLINK@davesgarden.com]
Pics not there yet .
This message was edited Oct 12, 2007 8:47 AM |
ginger749
October 12, 2007
3:25 AM Post #4074579
| Hi Terry ,
Could you please add family name :
Fabaceae - Mimosoideae . ( not sure which one ? )
Here is link to plant .
[HYPERLINK@plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au]
Thanks Kell ~ boy flower~
|
Resin
Northumberland
(United Kingdom)
(Zone 9a)
October 12, 2007
6:42 AM Post #4074668
| Hi Ginger,
| Quoted: | | Fabaceae - Mimosoideae ( not sure which one ? ) |
That means family Fabaceae, subfamily Mimosoideae. Anything ending "-aceae" is a family, while anything ending "-oideae" is a subfamily.
Resin
|
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
October 12, 2007
7:39 AM Post #4074782
| Kell,
all the Acacia's, that is all the Mimosoideae get entered in the family Mimosaceae.
Ken |
ginger749
October 13, 2007
4:24 PM Post #4079292
| Thanks Resin & Ken .
Yes it went straight through .
Went and Climbed Mt Barney yesterday .
Most of the flowers are finished .
But lots of new seeds I have not noticed before . |
ginger749
October 14, 2007
12:21 AM Post #4080534
| Ken,
What Species: name do I use for this ?
[HYPERLINK@zipcodezoo.com]
Thanks .
Kell |
ecrane3
Dublin, CA
(Zone 9a)
October 14, 2007
1:37 AM Post #4080658
| That one is a hybrid cultivar that doesn't have a species associated with it. Many hybrids are that way, it's not at all unusual. So just leave the species field blank when you put it in Plant Files. |
ginger749
October 14, 2007
1:56 AM Post #4080678
| Thanks ecrane3 ,
Kell |
ginger749
October 14, 2007
3:17 AM Post #4080793
| OK ecrane3 ,
I did what you said and got this ???
What do I do NEXT ???
Click the image for an enlarged view.
|
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
October 14, 2007
6:18 AM Post #4080894
| Kell, you put the cultivar name
Sid Cadwell
without quotes, in the box labelled
Cultivar Name,
below the species box,
Ken |
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
October 14, 2007
6:19 AM Post #4080895
| Terry,
Could you please add the genus
Almaleea
in the Papilionaceae
thanks,
Ken |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 14, 2007
8:24 AM Post #4081044
| Hi Ken,
I added Almaleea to the checklist - thanks! |
Xenomorf
Valley of the Sun, AZ
(Zone 9b)
October 15, 2007
11:32 AM Post #4085202
| Please add "Eberlanzia" in Aizoaceae
TIA. |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 15, 2007
12:25 PM Post #4085403
| Eberlanzia has been added to the checklist! |
ginger749
October 15, 2007
3:39 PM Post #4086051
| Terry,
Could you please add the genus
Elattostachys
in the Sapindaceae
thanks,
Kell |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 15, 2007
4:51 PM Post #4086280
| Elattostachys has been added to the checklist! |
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
October 16, 2007
2:33 AM Post #4088203
| Terry, I just discovered that the plant I identified as Lepyrodia was in fact not that species, but the Tassel Rope-rush (Hypolaena fastigiata).
Because I created the entry I have been able to change its name, so that the image is now stored in the right place. [HYPERLINK@davesgarden.com]
I suspect that the genus Hypolaena in the Restionaceae, is not in your list and you may want to add it.
Are you aware that there is this loophole for adding a new genus. You simply add it as belonging to an already approved genus, and then edit the entry and chage the genus name. The change is not subject to the check that is applied if the new genus is entered directly,
Ken |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 16, 2007
8:30 AM Post #4088617
| Hi Ken,
I've added it to the checklist. We also have a report that shows us any entries with a genus or family name not on the checklist, so we can keep tabs on anything that is out of place. Hopefully most people will continue to come through the "front door" and get us to put it in the checklist first so we can verify spellings and avoid potential duplicates (e.g., if you force an override but misspell the botanical name and an entry with the proper spelling already exists, then we have a bigger mess to sort out ;o) |
ginger749
October 16, 2007
3:54 PM Post #4090002
| Terry,
Which of these three family names do I use here ?
Caesalpiniaceae, Mimosaceae, or Papilionaceae.
It's still under Fabaceae on this site : [HYPERLINK@plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au]
Genus is Daviesia
thanks,
Kell |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 16, 2007
4:50 PM Post #4090156
| Per this thread: [HYPERLINK@davesgarden.com] it's in the Papilionaceae
Another way to check would be to look for other existing entries n PlantFiles, and determine which family was applied to them: [HYPERLINK@davesgarden.com]
|
ginger749
October 16, 2007
5:02 PM Post #4090195
| TaaM8 . |
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
October 16, 2007
5:24 PM Post #4090263
| Kell,
there is already an entry for Daviesia latifolia here: [HYPERLINK@davesgarden.com]
Ken |
ginger749
October 16, 2007
5:26 PM Post #4090271
| I've already added 4 Pics . thanks Ken . |
ginger749
October 17, 2007
2:30 AM Post #4091958
| Terry,
Could you please add the genus
Mirbelia
in the Papilionaceae
[HYPERLINK@plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au]
thanks,
Kell |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 17, 2007
8:21 AM Post #4092395
| Mirbelia has been added! |
ginger749
October 19, 2007
2:33 PM Post #4101472
| Terry,
Could you please add the Family
Luzuriagaceae
See plant here : [HYPERLINK@plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au]
thanks,
Kell |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 19, 2007
2:40 PM Post #4101502
| Luzuriagaceae has been added to the family checklist ;o) |
ginger749
October 19, 2007
3:05 PM Post #4101559
| That was very strange Terry .
At first I got the message ( this Family is not in the PF .)
Then you said ( Luzuriagaceae has been added )
When I went and re-sent it , Ken already had 3 or 4 Pics there ?
No big deal , Just curious .
Kell |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 19, 2007
3:57 PM Post #4101695
| Not sure what you saw...I haven't seen any entries in this family come through yet. |
ginger749
October 19, 2007
4:11 PM Post #4101728
| This is where I was directed to when I tried to add it .
[HYPERLINK@davesgarden.com]
But it's a differtent Family name .
Kell |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 19, 2007
4:33 PM Post #4101763
| the system guesses at the family or genus name you're trying to add, which works pretty well in cases where there's a simple typographical error.
When your spelling is correct, but the checklist doesn't contain that family or genus name, then the system's guess is probably wrong - and may be way wrong ;o) |
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
October 19, 2007
4:47 PM Post #4101813
| In this case, I think there has been a recent change in the family name. I believe that all the Australian Lilies and their near cousins have been changed recently. I suspect that none of the Australian lilies are in Liliaceae any more, and it seems that Smilacaceae has also been split up or otherwise modified.
Geitonoplesium is still in Smilacaceae in the Flora of Australia volume published 1987, and in the Flora of Victoria volume published in 1994, but is in Luzuriagaceae in the Flora of New South Wales volume, published in 1993.
Take your pick!
Ken |
ginger749
October 19, 2007
5:34 PM Post #4101955
| Thanks Ken for clearing that up .
It's a lovely small vine no matter what we call it .
Have you tried eating it ? |
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
October 19, 2007
6:33 PM Post #4102168
| No, but I read it can be used as an asparagus substitute. It doesn't grow near here, I have to drive 200km to find it! |
ginger749
October 21, 2007
4:55 AM Post #4106491
| Terry,
Could you please add the Genus :
Triunia
in the Proteaceae
See plant here : [HYPERLINK@plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au]
thanks,
Kell |
ginger749
October 21, 2007
6:21 PM Post #4108191
|
Terry,
Could you please add the Genus :
Alchornea
in the Euphorbiaceae
See plant here : [HYPERLINK@plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au]
thanks,
Kell |
ginger749
October 21, 2007
8:05 PM Post #4108514
|
Terry,
Could you please add the Genus :
Amylotheca
in the Loranthaceae
See plant here : [HYPERLINK@plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au]
thanks,
Kell |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 21, 2007
10:26 PM Post #4108988
| All three have been added to the checklist! |
ginger749
October 21, 2007
11:42 PM Post #4109265
| Terry,
Could you please add the Genus :
Dawsonia
in the Polytrichaceae
See plant here : [HYPERLINK@www.morwellnp.pangaean.net]
Isn't the Web Site above where Ken Works or helps ?
thanks,
Kell |
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
October 22, 2007
12:36 AM Post #4109371
| I don't think we are including mosses in PlantFiles at present. Terry what do you think?
Ken |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 22, 2007
8:48 AM Post #4109925
| We have a few bryophytes scattered throughout PlantFiles. The general guiding principle has been as long as it falls within Plantae kingdom, we will include it. |
ginger749
October 22, 2007
2:01 PM Post #4111000
| So does that mean Dawsonia is now included ? |
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
October 22, 2007
4:36 PM Post #4111546
| I tried adding Dawsonia superba, and the family is now accepted, but the Genus Dawsonia is still rejected.
Terry,
Could you please add the genus Dawsonia in the family Polytrichaciae to the approved list.
I have several moss photos and will add some to PlantFiles if they are allowed.
Yes Kell, the web site you used to show Dawsonia, is the one that I maintain for Morwell National Park, and almost all the images on that site are mine.
Ken |
ginger749
October 22, 2007
4:59 PM Post #4111617
| Well Ken you are doing a great job there .
Sounds like a great job .
And being able to take all those Pic's .
Just wonderful .
This moss is as close to a real tree as you can get .
Click the image for an enlarged view.
|
ginger749
October 22, 2007
10:13 PM Post #4112946
| Terry,
Could you please add the Genus :
Legnephora
in the Menispermaceae
See plant here : [HYPERLINK@plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au]
thanks,
Kell |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 22, 2007
10:41 PM Post #4113095
| Dawsonia and Legnephora have been added to the checklist. |
ginger749
October 22, 2007
10:42 PM Post #4113109
| And another Terry,
Could you please add the Family :
Peperomiaceae
Genus: Peperomia
See plant here : [HYPERLINK@plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au]
thanks
Kell
|
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 22, 2007
10:47 PM Post #4113129
| Peperomia is in there - we currently are applying Piperaceae as the family: [HYPERLINK@davesgarden.com]
If it needs to be changed, one of our PF editorial team will ensure all existing entries are edited. |
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
October 23, 2007
1:39 AM Post #4113499
| Kell, I have created the entry for Dawsonia superba and added my own images here: [HYPERLINK@davesgarden.com]
Ken |
ginger749
October 23, 2007
5:21 AM Post #4113597
| Terry,
Could you please add the Family :
Lamiaceae
Genus: Spartothamnella
See plant here : [HYPERLINK@plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au]
thanks
Kell
|
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 23, 2007
8:03 AM Post #4113834
| Spartothamnella has been added! |
ginger749
October 23, 2007
1:55 PM Post #4114980
| Terry,
Could you please add the Genus :
Trochocarpa
in the Epacridaceae
See plant here : [HYPERLINK@plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au]
thanks,
Kell |
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
October 23, 2007
4:30 PM Post #4115543
| Terry,
re; the request for Trochocarpa, this is one of many genera in Australia, until recently classified in Epacridaceae, but recently moved with all the Epacridaceae to Ericaceae.
I am suggesting, as we have many plants recorded as Epacridaceae, that we stick to Epacridaceae for this genus until such time as you decide that all Epacrids should become Ericaceae. The Flora of NSW has adopted the change recently, so that on-line all these plants are Ericaceae, but the printed version of the Flora of NSW still shows them all as Epacridaceae
Ken |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 23, 2007
4:39 PM Post #4115564
| Ken your suggestion sounds like a reasonable approach.
I've added Trochocarpa to our checklist as a valid genus; let's continue using Epacridaceae as a valid family name for the time being, for this and other genera.
When the dust settles, we'll see if the lumpers or splitters seem to be in the majority, and determine if we need to shift some family names. |
ginger749
October 24, 2007
12:01 AM Post #4117178
| Terry
I am trying to add a subsp. epilosus
to
Family: Rutaceae
Genus: Philotheca
Species: myoporoides
How do I do that ?
Thanks
Kell |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 24, 2007
8:03 AM Post #4117680
| Iit is entered as part of the specific epithet.
When you create the entry, in the species field enter "myoporoides subsp. epilosus" (no quote marks, of course) |
Xenomorf
Valley of the Sun, AZ
(Zone 9b)
October 26, 2007
10:21 AM Post #4125446
| Please add:
"Dasiphora" to Rosaceae
[HYPERLINK@plants.usda.gov]
TIA |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 26, 2007
2:06 PM Post #4126099
| Dasiphora has been added to the checklist! |
ginger749
October 27, 2007
2:47 PM Post #4129346
| Terry,
Could you please add the Genus :
Melichrus
in the Ericaceae
See plant here : [HYPERLINK@plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au]
thanks,
Kell |
ginger749
October 28, 2007
9:59 PM Post #4133851
| *Bump* |
ecrane3
Dublin, CA
(Zone 9a)
October 28, 2007
10:04 PM Post #4133874
| I don't think you need to bump this thread, I think Terry probably just decided to take a break for the weekend :-) |
Joan
Belfield, ND
(Zone 4a)
October 28, 2007
10:09 PM Post #4133899
| Melichrus has been added to the checklist. |
ginger749
October 28, 2007
11:08 PM Post #4134174
| Thanks Joan . |
ginger749
October 29, 2007
12:54 AM Post #4134472
| Joah
I am trying to enter Jacksonia
in Papilionaceae ,
I get a message the Genus name (Jacksonia) is not there .
According to this post by Terry [HYPERLINK@davesgarden.com]
It is there ?
This is the plant , [HYPERLINK@plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au]
Thanks
Kell
|
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 29, 2007
9:26 AM Post #4135065
| ecrane hit it on the head...I was out of pocket some this weekend (Sundays are usually my day off, although I'll pop in during the afternoon if everyone else is watching the game or napping ;o) A big thanks to Joan for stepping in!
Kell, I added Jacksonia to the checklist. The link you provided is a good reference ("map", if you will) of the families for each of those genera, but not all the names are in our checklist yet.)
|
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
October 29, 2007
3:10 PM Post #4136241
| Melichrus urceolatus is caught up in this recent change of all Epacridaceae into Ericaceae. The new entry has been made as Ericaceae. I believe that for consistency, until a decision is made to change all Epacrids, this species should have its family changed to Epacridaceae: [HYPERLINK@davesgarden.com]
|
ginger749
October 30, 2007
8:41 PM Post #4141226
| Is there a PF entry for kangaroo paw's in general ?
I have about 10 Pic's and they are all Un-named Hybrids .
Kell |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
October 30, 2007
10:32 PM Post #4141672
| As a rule, we don't have "general" entries or allow unnamed hybrid photos...the few older entries you may see here and there are being gradually culled out. |
ginger749
November 3, 2007
4:26 AM Post #4152847
| Please add Family name :
Uvulariaceae
You will find plant here :
[HYPERLINK@plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au]
Kell |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
November 3, 2007
11:06 AM Post #4153526
| We have the species Tripladenia cunninghamii entered here: [HYPERLINK@davesgarden.com] |
ginger749
November 8, 2007
1:03 PM Post #4171698
| Please add The genus name : Pullea
To Family : Cunoniaceae
Kell
[HYPERLINK@www.chabg.gov.au] |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
November 8, 2007
4:56 PM Post #4172478
| Pullea has been added to the checklist. |
ginger749
November 13, 2007
4:48 AM Post #4187959
| Request withdrawn .
Kell
This message was edited Nov 13, 2007 8:05 PM |
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
November 13, 2007
5:52 PM Post #4189879
| Terry,
Could you please add the Genus: Austrostipa in the Poaceae to the list.
Most Australian Stipa species have been moved into Austrostipa. I have already modified Stipa rudis to Austrostipa rudis and added Stipa rudis as a synonym, and will be adding another Austrostipa species soon,
thanks,
Ken |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
November 13, 2007
6:02 PM Post #4189899
| Austrostipa has been added! |
ginger749
November 13, 2007
7:33 PM Post #4190179
| Ken ,
Is there a secret to getting a reply in ten minutes ?
I have waited up to two days at times .
I would really like to know ,
As I keep my Plant entry open so I don't loose all my information .
After five hours I get booted from my Internet .
Kell |
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
November 13, 2007
10:25 PM Post #4190728
| Just luck, Terry does a great job looking after us, but is certainly not on full time watch over this thread. In any case we are on a completely different trime scale from hers.
I usually ask for new additions well ahead of using them. I an working through my slide collections scanning them and adding them to PlantFiles. I usually set up 100 plants that I will be scanning over the next weeks and then check which genera are already in PlantFiles and then put in a request for the missing ones. That means I am usually some weeks ahead with my requests.
I do occasionally have more immediate requests when I come across new plants. I just photographed Austrostipa muelleri, a beautiful and unusual grass, with single flowers instead of heads, spikes, racemes or what have you. I checked that a couple of days before wanting to upload the images and chanced to do so while Terry was checking this forum.
I usually add 5 images a day, and I currently have 190 images ready for uploading, so I am well ahead with all my new genera!
Ken |
ginger749
November 13, 2007
10:52 PM Post #4190824
| Thanks Ken . |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
November 13, 2007
10:55 PM Post #4190835
| It was just plain luck that I saw Ken's request (when the thread pops up on my thread watcher, I have no idea who has posted to it - when I see it's got a new post, I come take a gander.)
A couple things to keep in mind:
1) The other PlantFiles editors can also help you out with checklist additions. However, if you address your request to one of us specifically, we'll probably leave it for that person as a courtesy; and
2) I'm not likely to be around on weekends - probably less likely than some of the other editors who handle PlantFiles in their off hours. (I regularly log 50+ hours a week M-F here on the site, so I try to take off most of the day on Sunday to spend some downtime with my family. In the fall, Saturdays are also busy with football games and swim meets ;o)
So long story short...if you post a note to me after 10:00 any weeknight, I probably won't see it for 8-10 hours; if you post it on Friday night, it may be Monday before I get back to it. |
ginger749
November 14, 2007
1:34 AM Post #4191187
| Thanks Terry .
So there is a secret in a manner of speaking .
I am going to try to keep ahead of myself like Ken suggested .
At the moment I have posted all the Pics I want to post .
From now on they will be all new for me , Pics .
Also Flower season is almost over for us in Qld .
Now the fruit begins .
Cheers Kell |
ginger749
November 17, 2007
4:24 AM Post #4202553
| Could some one please add Family: Lomandraceae
Genus is : Lomandra
Link to Plant is : [HYPERLINK@plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au]
Kell
|
ginger749
November 17, 2007
4:39 AM Post #4202556
| Also could some one add : Rutaceae to the family list .
Genus: Flindersia
Link to tree . [HYPERLINK@plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au]
Kell |
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
November 17, 2007
6:38 AM Post #4202585
| Kell, Lomandra is already in Plantfiles, it is usually placed in Xanthorrhoeaceae:
[HYPERLINK@davesgarden.com]
Ken |
mystic
Ewing, KY
(Zone 6a)
November 17, 2007
11:33 AM Post #4203209
| Flindersia has been added to the accepted list. You should be able to add your entry now. |
ginger749
November 20, 2007
12:26 AM Post #4212582
|
Please add Genus : Tetraria
To Family : Cyperaceae
See Plant here : [HYPERLINK@plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au]
Kell |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
November 20, 2007
12:30 AM Post #4212596
| Tetraria has been added to the checklist. |
ginger749
November 21, 2007
4:30 AM Post #4216295
| WOW Terry ,
Four minutes for that last response .
I must have cracked the 'CODE' LOL
I now have a dilemma .
I took these Pic's yesterday .
What do I put This Eucalypt under ?
I have some great Pic's of the tree and gum nuts .
Please look at this name tag .
Looks like a three in one Tree ?
Cheers Kell
Click the image for an enlarged view.
|
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
November 21, 2007
4:42 AM Post #4216299
| kell,
That would be entered with the genus as Eucalyptus,
the species left blank and the name Summer Red entered as the cultivar name. There may be a way to indicate the parent species (Terry will know), but you can usefully add that information in a comment.
Ken |
ginger749
November 21, 2007
5:14 AM Post #4216306
| Thanks Ken ,
As this grafted Tree is a little out of my league ,
could YOU please add it for me at your convenience .
TaaM8
Kell |
ginger749
November 21, 2007
5:24 AM Post #4216311
| As you can see in this Pic .
The Gum Nuts are something special .
That's my finger at the top .
I was allowed to take a few of them .
Not sure if they are viable .
Kell
Click the image for an enlarged view.
|
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
November 21, 2007
7:31 AM Post #4216379
| OK Kell, here it is: [HYPERLINK@davesgarden.com]
note that it is not now considered as Eucalyptus: [HYPERLINK@asgap.org.au]
Along with its parents Eucalyptus ficifolia and Eucalyptus ptychocarpa, it has been moved to Corymbia
Ken |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
November 21, 2007
9:37 AM Post #4216659
| Ken, thanks for helping with this one - not only are Eucalyptus not a specialty of mine (they don't grow so well in zone 6b/7a), but I'm going to be a little hit-or-miss with the holiday this week. |
ecrane3
Dublin, CA
(Zone 9a)
November 21, 2007
11:20 AM Post #4217103
| When I add a plant that's a hybrid and I know the parent species, I usually just add a neutral-rated comment to the plant and include that info there. |
Kell
Northern California, CA
(Zone 9b)
November 23, 2007
2:27 AM Post #4221526
| Would you please add Mimetes under Proteaceae.
thanks,
Kelley |
Joan
Belfield, ND
(Zone 4a)
November 23, 2007
3:37 AM Post #4221586
| Mimetes has been added to the checklist. |
Kell
Northern California, CA
(Zone 9b)
November 23, 2007
4:25 AM Post #4221621
| Thank you, Joan. |
Kell
Northern California, CA
(Zone 9b)
November 30, 2007
2:17 AM Post #4245762
| Can you add Chimonocalamus to Poaceae for me?
[HYPERLINK@en.wikipedia.org]
I want to add Chimonocalamus pallens. Thanks |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
November 30, 2007
9:25 AM Post #4246138
| Kell, Chimonocalamus has been added to the checklist. |
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
December 1, 2007
3:56 PM Post #4250965
| Could you please add the genus
Platylobium
in the Papilionaceae
to the approved list,
Ken |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
December 1, 2007
7:22 PM Post #4251616
| Ken, Platylobium has been added! |
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
December 1, 2007
10:03 PM Post #4252211
| Thanks Terry,
Sorry to come back so soon with another request, but I just went for a walk in Mathison Park and discovered and photographed an unfamiliar grass, which proved to be Hainardia cylindrica.
Could you please therefor add the genus
Hainardia
in the Poaceae
to the approved list,
Ken |
Joan
Belfield, ND
(Zone 4a)
December 1, 2007
10:14 PM Post #4252256
| I added it for you Ken. |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
December 2, 2007
9:32 AM Post #4253112
| Thanks, Joan! (I was definitely more out than in yesterday...but most of our leaves are shredded and composting now ;o) |
Joan
Belfield, ND
(Zone 4a)
December 2, 2007
11:57 AM Post #4253504
| And I was more in than out. We've got a nice new blanket of snow covering up all our leaves. Out of sight out of mind. :) |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
December 2, 2007
2:59 PM Post #4253948
| Poor Joan! We were in Kansas over Thanksgiving and got about 2" of snow while we were there. Unless this year is very different from most years, that may be more snow than we get all winter here. Before you start a fire under the tarpot to dip me in, we *do* get some cold days and nights; just not much snow :-( |
Joan
Belfield, ND
(Zone 4a)
December 2, 2007
3:32 PM Post #4254047
| I hope we get 10 feet of snow this year. We have been in such a drought for so long that I think it's going to take a good hard winter with lots of snow to break that cycle. Last time we had any significant amount of snow was in 1992, and the last summer we had adequate rainfall was in 1993.
Now my neighbors up here in the frozen tundra are going to bombard me with snowballs. :) |
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
December 13, 2007
4:10 AM Post #4289990
| Terry,
could you please add the genus Ficinia in the Cyperaceae to the approved list?
thanks,
Ken |
Terry
Murfreesboro, TN
(Zone 7a)
December 13, 2007
11:50 AM Post #4290785
| Ken, Ficinia has been added to the checklist ;o) |
kennedyh
Churchill, Victoria
(Australia)
(Zone 10a)
January 7, 2008
5:01 PM Post #4372132
| Terry, a couple more genera to add please
in the Asteraceae:
Pallenis
and in the Papilionaceae:
Cullen
Cullen is an odd name for a genus, having not been Latinised as most names are. It incorporates all the Australian peas that were formerly placed in Psoralea, but we don't seem to have |
